Re: Today's L(garble)T(garble)A(garble)R

["Lou" <lspin@mediaone.net>]

I must admit that there are often times when the techhie-talk makes me gloss
over.  I would offer that "jargon" is in the ear of the be-hearer.  HOWEVER,
I zoom right into focus when the posts appear about the behind-the-scenes
escapades of radio personalities, or about the checkered histories of Boston
radio.  I love that stuff!  I guess there's something here for all types of
radio geek (said with affection).

Happy Holidays!

-Lou

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Billings" <dib9@gwi.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2001 12:30 AM
>
> I think Mr. Strassberg's objection was to the use of the term jargon,
which
> means "confused unintelligible language" or "obscure and often pretentious
> language marked by circumlocutions and long words ."
> ...Though some of the technical discussion may go
> over the head of people like me, that is not due to the use of jargon.