[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the demise of WEVD

To: Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com>
Subject: Re: the demise of WEVD
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:13:20 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010902195836.029d72d8@pop3.norton.antivirus>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010901124330.0297e720@pop3.norton.antivirus><3.0.3.32.20010902193637.006b3c54@user.xtdl.com><5.1.0.14.2.20010902195836.029d72d8@pop3.norton.antivirus>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Sun, 02 Sep 2001 20:02:27 -0400, Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com> said:

> Umm, WEVD has had the same calls since it first went on the air.

Um, the station which is now at 1050 is not the same station as the
WEVD that went on the air in the 1920s, which is now WWRV.

> Like many stations, including some heritage "big names" like WBZ
> (which used to be at 990 kHz) and WRKO (which as WNAC didn't get to
> be at 680 till the 1950s)

One of these is not like the other,
One of these does not belong.

-GAWollman

References:
- the demise of WEVD
  - From: Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com>
- Re: the demise of WEVD
  - From: SteveOrdinetz <steveord@wavewizard.com>
- Re: the demise of WEVD
  - From: Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com>
- Re: the demise of WEVD
  - From: Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Today's Herald
Next by Date: Re: 530 AM Frequency
Previous by thread: Re: the demise of WEVD
Next by thread: Re: the demise of WEVD
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread