[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Digital TV Conversion
Dib9@aol.com wrote:
> The bond issue is also strange because Maine Public Television is a private
> non-profit, not part of state government, and Maine tax payers will be on the
> hook for nearly $10 million if the bond passes.
You're missing another controversy: namely, the paid advertising Maine PBS
is putting on commercial television stations here in support of the bond
issue. That's right: Maine PBS is spending $200K of public money to lobby
for a bond issue to glom even *more* public money! Now *that's* what I call
return on investment! What an outrage, but then again Rob Gardiner has
always had a tin ear about public relations. His idea of PR is killing a
popular public affairs show when one of the panelists criticized Tabitha King,
wife of Stephen King and a member of the board of trustees. So much for
public broadcasting's much-vaunted editorial independence! He's also
jamming the public broadcasting airwaves with unpaid ads in favor of the
bond issue with no effort made to seek out alternative viewpoints.
Eliminating the Fairness Doctrine cuts both ways, it seems!
So, who is playing watchdog and letting the public know what Maine PBS is
trying to pull? Certainly not Portland NBC affiliate WCSH-TV, which has
declared editorial neutrality on the bond issue, citing an obvious conflict of
interest. The less-obvious conflict of interest is the fact that Maine PBS is
currently one of their biggest advertisers! The BDN piece is wimpy, wimpy,
wimpy and the writer doesn't understand the subject nearly well enough to
produce a coherent article. The one news entity that really knows where it's
at on this issue is the Portland Phoenix (surprise!) It's well worth seeking
out, despite the misspelling of the last name of my former colleague Keith
Shortall (acting news director of Maine Public Radio) who is openly critical of
Gardiner's tactics. I wonder if he'll end up like that public affairs show...
Take care,
Chris