[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Non-competes

To: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>
Subject: Re: Non-competes
From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@attorneyross.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:45:10 -0400
Cc: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309221122130.21055-100000@gordsven.com>
Organization: Law Office of A. Joseph Ross, J.D.
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030922102403.02e99af0@mail.speakeasy.net>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On 22 Sep 2003 at 11:23, Sven Franklyn Weil wrote:

> I believe it's against the law for drug companies to out-and-out advertise
> what the medicine does.

Given the number of ads I've seen that talk about what the medicine is for, I can't imagine 
how that could be so.  I've seen ads for heardburn remedies which clearly say that they're for 
heartburn, ads for headache remedies saying that they're for headaches, etc.  Currently 
there's an ad for a prescription toenail fungus remedy which clearly states that it's for getting 
rid of toenail fungus.

-- 
A. Joseph Ross, J.D.                           617.367.0468
 15 Court Square, Suite 210                 lawyer@attorneyross.com
Boston, MA 02108-2503           	         http://www.attorneyross.com

References:
- Re: Non-competes
  - From: Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net>
- Re: Non-competes
  - From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>

Prev by Date: WKRP GM dead
Next by Date: Re: Non-competes
Previous by thread: RE: Non-competes
Next by thread: Concept advertising (was Re: Non-competes)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread