[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WKTQ (was tv on radio)

To: "Garrett Wollman" <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, "Tony Abruzzese" <abruzzes@bu.edu>
Subject: Re: WKTQ (was tv on radio)
From: "Roger Kirk" <rogerkirk@ttlc.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:31:47 -0500
Cc: "Boston Radio mailing-list" <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
References: <00a101c1a516$7048fe60$20fb299b@bumc.bu.edu> <200201242052.g0OKqaT85088@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

Garrett Wollman wrote:

> At the time the new area codes were implemented, FCC rules
> explicitly prohibited such restrictions on overlay area codes.  

What was the reasoning behind not allowing overlays?  It seems
to be the logical thing to do. 

Oh, I get it - if it's logical, the FCC won't have any part of it?!

Roger Kirk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WKTQ (was tv on radio)
  - From: "Aaron 'Bishop' Read" <aread@speakeasy.net>

References:
- Fw: WKTQ (was tv on radio)
  - From: "Tony Abruzzese" <abruzzese@biochem.bumc.bu.edu>
- Fw: WKTQ (was tv on radio)
  - From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>

Prev by Date: Re: WBUR orgy
Next by Date: Re: BBC on the web
Previous by thread: Fw: WKTQ (was tv on radio)
Next by thread: Re: WKTQ (was tv on radio)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread