[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Boston TV for Sale/Pittsfield Auction

To: "Michael P Fitzpatrick Jr." <fitzradio@the-spa.com>
Subject: RE: Boston TV for Sale/Pittsfield Auction
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 21:16:03 -0500 (EST)
Cc: "Boston Radio" <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
In-Reply-To: <000201c16fc4$3b861280$5cf323d0@oemcomputer>
References: <3BF6EDD4.1C7AC70B@enercom.net><000201c16fc4$3b861280$5cf323d0@oemcomputer>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 19:01:54 -0500, "Michael P Fitzpatrick Jr." <fitzradio@the-spa.com> said:

> Isn't there a freeze on Analog TV original applications? Meaning if Channel
> 51 is awarded a license, they would have to be DTV.

The applicants for 51 applied in that last-minute rush before the
freeze, IIRC.

In any case, it will be an Albany station.  Not sure why anyone would
want to build an Albany station these days.

-GAWollman

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Boston TV for Sale/Pittsfield Auction
  - From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>

References:
- Boston TV for Sale/Pittsfield Auction
  - From: Bill Welch <bwelch@enercom.net>
- RE: Boston TV for Sale/Pittsfield Auction
  - From: "Michael P Fitzpatrick Jr." <fitzradio@the-spa.com>
- RE: Boston TV for Sale/Pittsfield Auction
  - From: "Michael P Fitzpatrick Jr." <fitzradio@the-spa.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Boston TV for Sale/Pittsfield Auction
Next by Date: Re: Evidently, WMass don't matter
Previous by thread: RE: Boston TV for Sale/Pittsfield Auction
Next by thread: RE: Boston TV for Sale/Pittsfield Auction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread