[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IBOC

To: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>
Subject: Re: IBOC
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:54:06 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Boston-Radio-Interest <Boston-Radio-Interest@bostonradio.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111121006580.10209-100000@home.gordsven.com>
References: <200111121458.fACEwIl25319@gabriel.gabriel.cambridge.ma.us><Pine.LNX.4.10.10111121006580.10209-100000@home.gordsven.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:09:12 -0500 (EST), Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com> said:

> You'd think the world would have settled on one (or two) standards.

In essence, it has: the world has settled on Eureka-147, and the
United States has settled on anything but!

My general feeling is the DAB of whatever flavor is a solution in
search of a problem... but there is at least one system that's
already deployed and operating (and it's not IBOC).

-GAWollman

Follow-Ups:
- RE: IBOC
  - From: "Hakim Madjid" <HMadjid@mindspring.com>
- Re: IBOC
  - From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>

References:
- Re: IBOC
  - From: Richard Chonak <rac@gabriel.cambridge.ma.us>
- Re: IBOC
  - From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>
- Re: IBOC
  - From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Plane crash in NYC
Next by Date: RE: Plane crash in NYC
Previous by thread: Re: IBOC
Next by thread: Re: IBOC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread