[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Satellite Radio

To: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@shoreham.net>, "Boston Radio Interest" <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
Subject: RE: Satellite Radio
From: "Hakim Madjid" <HMadjid@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:05:11 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <000501c13a1d$8e1e5660$44fd90d0@003774259>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

Bill O'Neill wrote:

>MSNBC reports XM satellite radio won't be able to break even until it
>reaches the 3-4M subscriber level.  Should be interesting.
>http://www.msnbc.com/news/626514.asp?0na=2205360r

I have my doubts that staellite radio will succceed. I don't think people
are going want to pay $10 a month subscriptions for it. Especially not with
a recessionary economy.

I just  looked at the MSNBC message board, so far the 3 or 4 comments posted
regarding the XM service all give a thumbs down to the service.

73, de Hakim (N1ZFF)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Satellite Radio
  - From: Paul Anderson <plandrsn@ma.ultranet.com>
- Re: Satellite Radio
  - From: "Joseph Pappalardo" <joepappalardo2001@yahoo.com>
- RE: Satellite Radio
  - From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>

References:
- Satellite Radio
  - From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@shoreham.net>

Prev by Date: Re: FM Radio DXing
Next by Date: RE: Satellite Radio
Previous by thread: Satellite Radio
Next by thread: RE: Satellite Radio
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread