[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[1]RE>boston-radio-interest-digest V4 #75
Happy 4th of July Weekend!
Our offices are CLOSED. We will re-open on Wednesday July 5th. If this is
urgent, you may page me at 617-408-1935. Otherwise, I'll be sure to get back to
you Wednesday.
Have a safe and fun 4th!!!
On 07/03/2000, boston-radio-interest wrote:
>
>boston-radio-interest-digest Monday, July 3 2000
>Volume 04 : Number 075
>
>
>
>Subjects in this issue:
>
> the real "all girl station"
> Glick
> Re: the real "all girl station"
> Re: Glick
> Re: Glick
> Re: WBOT
> Re: the real "all girl station"
> Re: A Plug For The List/NERW on WCAP
> Re: A Plug For The List/NERW on WCAP
> Re: Glick
> Re: the real "all girl station"
> Re: WBOT
> Re: WBOT
> Re: WBOT
> Re: WBOT
> Turntables (was WBOT)
> Re: Turntables (was WBOT)
> Re: the real "all girl station" and WNAC
>history
> me, myself, and...
> Re: WBOT
> Fireworks, radio, etc.
> [Fwd: Fireworks, radio, etc.]
> Re: Fireworks, radio, etc.
> Re: Fireworks, radio, etc.
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>-------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 21:15:41 -0400
>From: Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com>
>Subject: the real "all girl station"
>
>For those who haven't seen this yet... here is the
>true story of John
>Shepard 3rd's all female station...
>
>http://www.radiodigest.com/columns_women/2000/wom_0
>63000_graham_1.phtml
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 22:39:38 -0400
>From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@mail.com>
>Subject: Glick
>
>What is the schedule for Larry on 'MEX?
>
>Bill O'Neill
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 23:00:24 -0400
>From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@world.std.com>
>Subject: Re: the real "all girl station"
>
>On 2 Jul 2000, Donna Halper wrote:
>
>> For those who haven't seen this yet... here is
>the true story of John
>> Shepard 3rd's all female station...
>>
>>
>http://www.radiodigest.com/columns_women/2000/wom_0
>63000_graham_1.phtml
>
>Good story. But a few times, they refer to
>Shepard's station as "WNAB."
>Was there a WNAB or is that a typo for WNAC?
>
>
>===================================================
> A. Joseph Ross, J.D.
>617.367.0468
> 15 Court Square
>lawyer@world.std.com
> Boston, MA 02108-2503
>http://world.std.com/~lawyer/
>===================================================
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 23:17:23 -0400
>From: "Dan Strassberg"
><Dan.Strassberg@worldnet.att.net>
>Subject: Re: Glick
>
>Sundays 4:00 to 5:00 PM. Maybe he'll take the
>winter off. If not, they'll
>have to juggle the show time after November 1, when
>sunset drops
>back to 4:30. WMEX may get another 15 minutes after
>local sunset
>at reasonable power when fall rolls around again,
>but in June they
>went straight from CH power to really low power at
>8:30 PM and that
>seems to be what is happening at 8:15 now that it's
>July.
>
>Also, Glick mentioned on today's show that Jerry
>Williams _will_ be
>coming back. Williams and station owner Alex Langer
>are supposed
>to be on the air taking calls on July 4 from 11:00
>to 1:00 while
>Marjoie Clapprood takes the holiday off.
>
>- --
>
>Dan Strassberg, dan.strassberg@worldnet.att.net
>Phone: 1-617-558-4205, eFax: 1-707-215-6367
>
>- -----Original Message-----
>From: Bill O'Neill <billo@mail.com>
>To: Boston Radio Interest <bri@bostonradio.org>
>Date: Sunday, July 02, 2000 10:41 PM
>Subject: Glick
>
>
>>What is the schedule for Larry on 'MEX?
>>
>>Bill O'Neill
>>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 23:17:32 -0400
>From: "Dan Strassberg"
><Dan.Strassberg@worldnet.att.net>
>Subject: Re: Glick
>
>Sundays 4:00 to 5:00 PM. Maybe he'll take the
>winter off. If not, they'll
>have to juggle the show time after November 1, when
>sunset drops
>back to 4:30. WMEX may get another 15 minutes after
>local sunset
>at reasonable power when fall rolls around again,
>but in June they
>went straight from CH power to really low power at
>8:30 PM and that
>seems to be what is happening at 8:15 now that it's
>July.
>
>Also, Glick mentioned on today's show that Jerry
>Williams _will_ be
>coming back. Williams and station owner Alex Langer
>are supposed
>to be on the air taking calls on July 4 from 11:00
>to 1:00 while
>Marjoie Clapprood takes the holiday off.
>
>- --
>
>Dan Strassberg, dan.strassberg@worldnet.att.net
>Phone: 1-617-558-4205, eFax: 1-707-215-6367
>
>- -----Original Message-----
>From: Bill O'Neill <billo@mail.com>
>To: Boston Radio Interest <bri@bostonradio.org>
>Date: Sunday, July 02, 2000 10:41 PM
>Subject: Glick
>
>
>>What is the schedule for Larry on 'MEX?
>>
>>Bill O'Neill
>>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 00:09:58 EDT
>From: Jibguy@aol.com
>Subject: Re: WBOT
>
>In a message dated 7/2/00 12:18:33 PM Eastern
>Daylight Time,
>umar@nerodia.wcrb.com writes:
>
><< Ron Robin did something like that at WBOS "Disco
>93" back in 1978, I'm
> told.
> >>
>
>True. All DJ's excepting overnight and most
>weekend shifts, were dual
>efforts. Club DJ's doing the mixing, and DJ's
>speaking once every 20
>minutes. Got pretty boring for the DJ's,
>especially me, the 10-to-2-guy.
>
>- ---jibguy
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 01:14:13 -0400
>From: Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com>
>Subject: Re: the real "all girl station"
>
>>Joe Ross wrote--
>>Good story. But a few times, they refer to
>Shepard's station as "WNAB."
>>Was there a WNAB or is that a typo for WNAC?
>
>In 1926, after trying for several years to get
>those calls, Shepard was
>finally able to acquire them. A station in the
>south had them first. He
>used WNAB for public affairs programming mainly.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 01:34:33 -0400
>From: "Kevin Vahey" <kvahey@mediaone.net>
>Subject: Re: A Plug For The List/NERW on WCAP
>
>umm where in Chelmsford exactly?
>
>
>- ----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@erols.com>
>To: "Mark" <markwats@netway.com>
>Cc: <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
>Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2000 2:50 PM
>Subject: Re: A Plug For The List/NERW on WCAP
>
>
>> It was a great time. I must admit, that although
>I expected a decent
>> turn-out there, it was a very impressive showing
>at the location. Gary
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 01:36:44 -0400
>From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@erols.com>
>Subject: Re: A Plug For The List/NERW on WCAP
>
>Kevin Vahey wrote:
>>
>> umm where in Chelmsford exactly?
>
>Gary's Ice Cream is on the short stretch of Route
>3A in Chelms. that
>links Lowell and Billerica.
>
>Bill O'Neill
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 07:17:41 -0400
>From: EBRadio 89_3 - The Neighborhood 1
><ebradio@flash.net>
>Subject: Re: Glick
>
>Larry is on 4 to 5 pm on Sunday's. Although, Larry
>handles the show well,
>be prepared for a technical nightmare,
>unfortunately.
>
>
>SS
>
>
>At 10:39 PM 7/2/00 -0400, you wrote:
>>What is the schedule for Larry on 'MEX?
>>
>>Bill O'Neill
>>
>>
>Visit the Classic EBRadio Neighborhood Web Site
>
>http://www.flash.net/~ebradio
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 07:26:52 -0400
>From: "Dan Strassberg"
><Dan.Strassberg@worldnet.att.net>
>Subject: Re: the real "all girl station"
>
>Did the letters WNAC stand for anything? I didn't
>think so. If that's the
>case, has your research on Shepard revealed why he
>wanted WNAC and why WNAB
>wasn't just as good in his mind? As far as I know,
>the National Association
>of Broadcasters didn't yet exist, so there was no
>conflict with the initials
>of the broadcasters' organization. Though, later
>on, when the NAB _did_
>exist, didn't Shepart pull out of it as a result of
>some grievance with the
>organization?. Also, didn't he change the calls of
>WASN to WAAB at some
>point?
>
>Until 1943, when the FCC broke up duopolies,
>Shepard had two Boston
>stations, WNAC, which, after March 1941, was on
>1260 and WAAB, which was on
>1440. Then, to fend off forced divestiture of WAAB,
>he moved that station to
>Worcester. Which brings up the question of why,
>when he changed the calls of
>WASN, he picked the WAAB calls. For years and
>years, until some station got
>WAAA, WAAB was first alphabetically among US
>stations with Wxxx calls. Was
>that the reason Shepard chose WAAB? I guess being
>first alphabetically is a
>nice distinction. (If potential advertisers used
>the Yellow Pages to find
>radio stations, WAAB would have been first on the
>list.) But, I don't think
>the letters WAAB stood for anything. (The calls
>might have stood for We're
>Always the Absolute Best, but I don't think they
>did.)
>
>Since Shepard owned a station (WNAB) with calls so
>close to WNEB, which, as
>far as I know, were available at the time, one
>would think he would have
>grabbed WNEB, which obviously could stand for New
>England Broadcasting--and
>probably did so when the 1230 station in Worcester
>went on the air.
>
>- --
>
>Dan Strassberg, dan.strassberg@worldnet.att.net
>Phone: 1-617-558-4205, eFax: 1-707-215-6367
>
>- -----Original Message-----
>From: Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com>
>To: A. Joseph Ross <lawyer@world.std.com>
>Cc: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
><boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
>Date: Monday, July 03, 2000 1:14 AM
>Subject: Re: the real "all girl station"
>
>
>>
>>>Joe Ross wrote--
>>>Good story. But a few times, they refer to
>Shepard's station as "WNAB."
>>>Was there a WNAB or is that a typo for WNAC?
>>
>>In 1926, after trying for several years to get
>those calls, Shepard was
>>finally able to acquire them. A station in the
>south had them first. He
>>used WNAB for public affairs programming mainly.
>>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 08:10:14 EDT
>From: RWalker653@aol.com
>Subject: Re: WBOT
>
>In a message dated 7/3/00 12:11:48 AM Eastern
>Daylight Time, Jibguy@aol.com
>writes:
>
>> True. All DJ's excepting overnight and most
>weekend shifts, were dual
>> efforts. Club DJ's doing the mixing, and DJ's
>speaking once every 20
>> minutes. Got pretty boring for the DJ's,
>especially me, the 10-to-2-guy.
>>
>
>
>I'm curious to know more about how the club jock
>did the mix on the air. I
>know the technology was a little less advanced than
>it is now, weren't there
>just awful mixes on the air? Did the turntables
>even have an adjustable pitch
>control?
>
>Rob @ WXLO
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 08:20:29 -0400
>From: Brian Vita <brian_vita@cssinc.com>
>Subject: Re: WBOT
>
>At 08:10 AM 7/3/00 -0400, RWalker653@aol.com wrote:
>>In a message dated 7/3/00 12:11:48 AM Eastern
>Daylight Time, Jibguy@aol.com
>>writes:
>>
>> > True. All DJ's excepting overnight and most
>weekend shifts, were dual
>> > efforts. Club DJ's doing the mixing, and DJ's
>speaking once every 20
>> > minutes. Got pretty boring for the DJ's,
>especially me, the 10-to-2-guy.
>> >
>>
>>
>>I'm curious to know more about how the club jock
>did the mix on the air. I
>>know the technology was a little less advanced
>than it is now, weren't there
>>just awful mixes on the air? Did the turntables
>even have an adjustable pitch
>>control?
>>
>>Rob @ WXLO
>
>Didn't the bird's beaks get dull? Just how long
>ago do you think this was?
>Sometime around the Flintstones? The Technic
>turntables did have pitch
>controls *and* even timing marks on the perimeter
>of the platter. It was a
>real bitch cueing up those wax cylinders though...
>;-)
>
>
>Brian
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:15:33 EDT
>From: RWalker653@aol.com
>Subject: Re: WBOT
>
>In a message dated 7/3/00 8:20:56 AM Eastern
>Daylight Time,
>brian_vita@cssinc.com writes:
>
>> Didn't the bird's beaks get dull? Just how long
>ago do you think this was?
>> Sometime around the Flintstones? The Technic
>turntables did have pitch
>> controls *and* even timing marks on the
>perimeter of the platter. It was a
>> real bitch cueing up those wax cylinders
>though... ;-)
>>
>
>Well, when I think of 1978 radio, in my mind I see
>old Russco or Gates
>turntables. I know the "DJ standard" turntable, the
>Technic SL-1200 didn't
>come into use 'til the mid 80's, and most club
>jocks were using belt drive
>turntables with rudimentary pitch control.
>
>The art of beat mixing really came into it's own in
>the early 80's... when
>the New York Street DJs perfected it.
>
>So, I guess the question I should be asking is,
>"how involved were the mixes?"
>
>Rob @ XLO
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:41:55 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>
>Subject: Re: WBOT
>
>Hasn't the Technics 1200 been around since the late
>70s?
>
>What about the other generation of direct-drive
>Technics record players
>that were on a wooden base? The ones that had
>either 3 or 2 speeds, a
>rotary pitch control on the front - you had to buy
>the arm, cover, base
>and turntable/motor assy. separately. These things
>cost like $1000 and
>up.
>
>I remember using them at WSIA and WNYU here in NYC.
>'SIA had the
>two-speed version, 'NYU has the 3-speed version
>with an LED
>digital-display pitch control that was activated
>using three buttons: -,
>reset, +.
>
>I think it was the SP-15 or something like that.
>They were very beautiful
>turntables (when on the wooden base-boards); and
>very accurate. I think
>they used the same motor as the SL-1200.
>
>Anyone else know what I'm talking about?
>
>On Mon, 3 Jul 2000 RWalker653@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> Well, when I think of 1978 radio, in my mind I
>see old Russco or Gates
>> turntables. I know the "DJ standard" turntable,
>the Technic SL-1200 didn't
>> come into use 'til the mid 80's, and most club
>jocks were using belt drive
>> turntables with rudimentary pitch control.
>
>- --
>Sven F. Weil
>email: sven@chookus.com
>WWW homepage:
>http://home.gordsven.com/gordsven/sven
>RadioLand Site:
>http://home.gordsven.com/gordsven/sven/radiomuseum.
>html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:44:20 EDT
>From: RWalker653@aol.com
>Subject: Turntables (was WBOT)
>
>I did some more research and I stand corrected.
>
>"Sometime in the early 70's Technics released the
>original SL-1200 as a hi-fi
>turntable. Then sometime around 1978-79 they did
>some work improving the
>motor, redesigning the casing, adding a separate
>ground wire, etc. and
>released the SL-1200Mark2. This is what the
>majority of DJ's have and this
>design still endures today"
>
>~from the "Technichs SL1200 FAQ Page"
>http://music.hyperreal.org/dj/sl1200.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 12:31:52 -0400
>From: John Mullaney <john@minutemancomm.com>
>Subject: Re: Turntables (was WBOT)
>
>But I think you will find radio stations where all
>using Technics SP-15's and
>25's even before this. 1200's where the lighter,
>cheaper and portable scaled down
>versions made for club dj use. I have seen 1200's
>used at some college and high
>school stations where they just didn't have the
>budgets for their professional
>cousins.
>
>RWalker653@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I did some more research and I stand corrected.
>>
>> "Sometime in the early 70's Technics released the
>original SL-1200 as a hi-fi
>> turntable. Then sometime around 1978-79 they did
>some work improving the
>> motor, redesigning the casing, adding a separate
>ground wire, etc. and
>> released the SL-1200Mark2. This is what the
>majority of DJ's have and this
>> design still endures today"
>>
>> ~from the "Technichs SL1200 FAQ Page"
>> http://music.hyperreal.org/dj/sl1200.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 13:09:54 -0400
>From: Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com>
>Subject: Re: the real "all girl station" and WNAC
>history
>
>Dan wrote:
>>Did the letters WNAC stand for anything? I didn't
>think so. If that's the
>>case, has your research on Shepard revealed why he
>wanted WNAC and why WNAB
>>wasn't just as good in his mind? As far as I know,
>the National Association
>>of Broadcasters didn't yet exist, so there was no
>conflict with the initials
>>of the broadcasters' organization. Though, later
>on, when the NAB _did_
>>exist, didn't Shepart pull out of it as a result
>of some grievance with the
>>organization?. Also, didn't he change the calls of
>WASN to WAAB at some
>>point?
>
>Dan's point is a good one, but interestingly, the
>NAB absolutely DID exist
>and Shepard was one of its founders. But the call
>letters WNAB pre-dated
>it by a year, so I guess they never complained.
>(The NAB was founded in mid
>1923.) WNAC was a sequentially assigned call-- the
>station actually went
>on the air in late July of 1922 before it ever got
>call letters. My theory
>is it used the ham calls of its chief engineer Irv
>Robinson, because no
>calls were assigned till September. Until then,
>even the newspapers just
>called it the "Shepard Store station." But in mid
>September of 1922, it
>was assigned WNAC.
>
>WASN lasted about 6 months, became WBIS (Boston's
>information source) and
>then folded into WNAC around 1930. As for WAAB,
>that was purchased by
>Shepard in 1931-- it was the old WLEX in Lexington,
>Carl Wheeler's station.
>
>Dan also wrote--
>>Was
>>that the reason Shepard chose WAAB? I guess being
>first alphabetically is a
>>nice distinction. (If potential advertisers used
>the Yellow Pages to find
>>radio stations, WAAB would have been first on the
>list.) But, I don't think
>>the letters WAAB stood for anything. (The calls
>might have stood for We're
>>Always the Absolute Best, but I don't think they
>did.)
>
>WAAB was also an assigned call. Shepard always
>came up with good sales
>slogans, but first he had to see what the FCC gave
>him. It's interesting
>that he never asked for (or at least never
>received) assigned calls for his
>initials. WASN and WBIS seem to have been
>requested, but he never asked
>for WAJS (John Shepard) the way a few owners asked
>for stations with their
>initials...
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
>From: "Bob Nelson...WMWM" <bobonradio@yahoo.com>
>Subject: me, myself, and...
>
>(Hope this didn't come up already; I was off the
>list
>for a week as I was away). In the new movie "Me
>Myself
>and Irene", you can spot 3 Boston radio
>personalities:
>
>Steve Sweeney (soon to be Tai's partner on the WZLX
>morning show after Charles Laquidara retires) is
>Jim
>Carrey's next door neighbor, and WEEI morning team
>John Dennis and Gerry Callahan are in the Vermont
>motel scene-- Callahan as a state trooper, and
>Dennis
>as a reporter. They don't have speaking roles but
>Sweeney does.
>
>Other Boston TV and radio personalities have been
>in films as well; Howie Carr is seen and heard at
>the
>beginning of "A Civil Action" and the horror film
>"Piranha" had a TV reporter played by someone who
>later went on to Ch. 4 (Ted Wayman I believe?)--
>this man was living and working in Texas at the
>time
>the film was shot. And I remember seeing the
>trailer
>for the film "Mermaids" and could swear I saw Rex
>Trailer as a doctor.
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
>http://invites.yahoo.com/
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 16:49:53 -0400 (EDT)
>From: umar@nerodia.wcrb.com
>Subject: Re: WBOT
>
>On Mon, 3 Jul 2000 RWalker653@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I'm curious to know more about how the club jock
>did the mix on the air. I
>> know the technology was a little less advanced
>than it is now, weren't there
>> just awful mixes on the air? Did the turntables
>even have an adjustable pitch
>> control?
>
>When I got there (September 1980, about 6 months
>after the end of Disco),
>WBOS had a couple of SP-10 Mark IIs, not pitch-
>adjustable, and a couple of
>other Technics turntables -- I think they were SL-
>1200's, but my memory is
>not what I wish it were -- that had variable pitch
>controls. The AM side,
>WUNR, had a lot of QRK and Russco rim-drive
>"Rumblemasters".
>
>The early Disco format seems to have included a lot
>of songs on
>reel-to-reel tapes -- many of the tapes were still
>out at the Newton
>transmitter site as recently as 10 years ago.
>
>"Disco 93" was run from the WUNR transmitter site
>in Newton. There were
>some WUNR studios at the Bradford in Boston (fifth
>floor, formerly WBZ, or
>so I'm told) with the sales offices, but all WBOS
>programming came out of
>Newton until 1981.
>
>
>Rob Landry
>umar@nerodia.wcrb.com
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 16:54:12 -0400
>From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@mail.com>
>Subject: Fireworks, radio, etc.
>
>Are there any plans for synchronized music/radio
>with fireworks this
>Fourth?
>
>Bill O'Neill
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 16:55:49 -0400
>From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@mail.com>
>Subject: [Fwd: Fireworks, radio, etc.]
>
>Bill O'Neill wrote:
>>
>> Are there any plans for synchronized music/radio
>with fireworks this
>> Fourth?
>>
>> Bill O'Neill
>
>PS - I've changed email to billo@mail.com Thanks -
>b
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 17:43:55 EDT
>From: Sptseditor@aol.com
>Subject: Re: Fireworks, radio, etc.
>
>In a message dated 7/3/00 4:55:40 PM Eastern
>Daylight Time, billo@mail.com
>writes:
>
><< Are there any plans for synchronized music/radio
>with fireworks this
> Fourth? >>
>
>In recent years, WCRB has been airing the
>synchronized music which is
>produced at the Esplanade. Before 1998 (IIRC), they
>aired classical music
>which I presume the station's management felt was
>appropriate to be aired
>with the fireworks. Personally, I prefer the
>approach WCRB uses now, along
>with the occasional cut-ins from Dave McNeil (?).
>
>- -Sean
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 21:50:49 -0400
>From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@mail.com>
>Subject: Re: Fireworks, radio, etc.
>
>Sptseditor@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> In a message dated 7/3/00 4:55:40 PM Eastern
>Daylight Time, billo@mail.com
>> writes:
>>
>> << Are there any plans for synchronized
>music/radio with fireworks this
>> Fourth? >>
>>
>> In recent years, WCRB has been airing the
>synchronized music which is
>> produced at the Esplanade. Before 1998 (IIRC),
>they aired classical music
>> which I presume the station's management felt was
>appropriate to be aired
>> with the fireworks. Personally, I prefer the
>approach WCRB uses now, along
>> with the occasional cut-ins from Dave McNeil (?).
>>
>> -Sean
>
>In the stylings of the late Norm Nathan, I can't
>believe how dumb my
>question was there. Here we have a big deal
>fireworks valued at over
>a million bucks. Wait, there's more: The Boston
>POPS sportin' a big
>ass 1812 on the audio channel and I sit there and
>ask what FMer's
>gonna CD along for the ride. I really need another
>puppy. Just carry
>on as if I'm part of the wait staff.
>
>Bill O'Neill
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of boston-radio-interest-digest V4 #75
>******************************************
>
>
>RFC822 header
>-----------------------------------
> Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu
>([18.24.4.193]) by exchange.wfnx.com with SMTP
>(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version
>5.5.2650.21)
> id NHJFZDSA; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:27:28 -0400
> Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
>WAA19590
> for boston-radio-interest-digest-outgoing;
>Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:26:04 -0400 (EDT)
> (envelope-from owner-boston-radio-interest-
>digest@bostonradio.org)
> Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:26:04 -0400 (EDT)
> Message-Id:
><200007040226.WAA19590@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
> From: owner-boston-radio-interest-
>digest@bostonradio.org (boston-radio-interest-
>digest)
> To: boston-radio-interest-digest@bostonradio.org
> Subject: boston-radio-interest-digest V4 #75
> Reply-To: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
> Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest-
>digest@bostonradio.org
> Errors-To: owner-boston-radio-interest-
>digest@bostonradio.org
> Precedence: bulk
>
>
Krissy Galster
FNX Radio Network
phone: 781-595-6200 x 208
e-mail: kgalster@fnxradio.com