[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Non-compete contract
On 17 Apr 2000, Dave Faneuf wrote:
> I don't recall seeing any language like that in the bill that was
> approved. I think if you violate your contract and cut and run the
> employer recourse would be to sue you for breach of contract, not
> violation of non-compete.
The measure of damages would be hard to establish for that. The non-
compete is a much cleaner remedy. And that kind of contract violation is
the strongest case for enforcement of the noncompete clause.
> I agree I think employers brought the non-compete ban on themselves by
> enforcing it even when the employer terminated the services of the
> employee. I personally know of talent that had non-competes that prevented
> them from working ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET for a year or more after leaving
> the employ of the company regardless of why they left.
I think that most courts would refuse to enforce a non-compete clause that
was that extensive. Trouble is, that wouldn't stop the employer from
suing and costing the talent a lot in legal fees.
A. Joseph Ross, J.D. 617.367.0468
15 Court Square email@example.com
Boston, MA 02108-2503 http://world.std.com/~lawyer/