[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AM (was Re: LPFM Rules)

To: <bri@bostonradio.org>
Subject: Re: AM (was Re: LPFM Rules)
From: "Chris Beckwith" <beckwith@ime.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 20:16:18 -0500
References: <3.0.3.32.20000202150410.006a8a64@user.xtdl.com> <389ADBCD.B6E2F559@earthlink.net>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

"Mike Thomas" <nostatic@earthlink.net> wrote:

> We have talked in the past on this list about standards and talk moving to
> FM.  It's the future, so get used to it.

Agreed, so I hope the FCC will consider reclassifying TV Channel 6 for an FM
"expanded band," hopefully for allocation to qualified LPFM candidates.  Though
there would be a significant adoption curve for radio listeners, it pales in
comparison to what digital TV has in store for us.

Take care,
Chris

References:
- AM (was Re: LPFM Rules)
  - From: SteveOrdinetz <steveord@wavewizard.com>
- Re: AM (was Re: LPFM Rules)
  - From: Mike Thomas <nostatic@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Best Jingle Sings (was: WROR)
Next by Date: Re: Best Jingle Sings (was: WROR)
Previous by thread: Re: AM (was Re: LPFM Rules)
Next by thread: Re: Delay ( was Bob Bittner's Unlikely Ally In The Fight Against The"CashMachine")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread