[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: why put talk on FM??? Well....
- Subject: RE: why put talk on FM??? Well....
- From: "Fitzpatrick, Mike" <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:52:59 -0400
In the Springfield area I have
WNNZ, WMAS, WDRC, WTIC... The other eight are stuff I have DX'ed and locked
I listen to WDRC-AM in C-QUAM stereo at home all the time.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Tim
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 4:00 PM
> To: Bump Martin; firstname.lastname@example.org;
> Subject: why put talk on FM??? Well....
> Have read with interest the discussion about the
> new talk station on 96.9 in Boston, and just why
> talk doesn't stay on AM.
> A couple people made good points about many
> FM stations having better, more-consistent
> But....to me the biggest reason is one nobody's
> mentioned yet.....younger listeners (mostly
> under age 50) are overwhelmingly FM-band
> You could have the youngest, hippest, best-sounding
> AM talker around, and in most markets you'd have
> one heck of a time trying to get FM-partisans to
> even flip the FM to AM switch (radio people and
> radio hobbyists are not "normal" listeners).
> Or, put it this way: talk in FM is fishing in a pond
> rather than fishing in a bathtub. Guess where
> you're likely to catch more "younger" fish?