[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WADN
I believe it's your radio in part. For example, I have a top-of-the-line
Alpine with S meter and all the goodies. It does not have this problem at
all. And it is the most sensitive and selective radio I have ever seen.
It is amazing. On the other hand, I have a Chrysler/Infinity FM/AM-Stereo
that does have a problem at Wellington with WPZE., WXKS, and WILD.
Ammazing the difference from one tuner to the next.
At 07:30 AM 7/28/97 EDT, ehenness@natick-amed02.army.mil wrote:
>Dan Strassberg mentions the now much-reduced splatter of WNFT vs WADN, and
>also:
>
>>I tried tuning in 1120 as I drove across Fort Point
>>Channel. WADN absolutely does not exist there on my car radio (this is the
>>car without the ignition-noise problem). What does exist on 1120 (and
>pretty
>>much every channel between 1060 and 1120) is WILD. I don't believe that
>WILD
>>couldn't sound just as loud and just as good to 99.99% of listeners if it
>>installed filters that kept if from splattering that way.
>
>And WXKS, as Dan said in a part of this same message I cut, does splatter
>some as well. And it's pretty strong in the Wellington neighborhood of
>Medford, which is pretty much the area covered in the triangle between WILD,
> WPZE, and WXKS. The splatter there from 1090 and 1430 (590's not that bad,
> considering the proximity to the stick) is unreal.
>
>Does anyone care to tackle why my car AM radio seems to suffer from 'front
>end overload' from WPZE in most of that area, or 1430 or 1090 (depending on
>how close to those antennas I am)? I know the phenomenon exists in FM
>tuners, but I didn't think it happened on AM. I can faintly yet clearly
>hear 590 or 1090 under WBZ or any of the other AM stations when I'm within,
>say, a quarter-mile of these.
>
>This is a Chrysler factory AM/FM cassette, and it's the radio, since it has
>happened in both cars the radio was in.
>
>Is it ground conductivity again? :-)
>
>Ed Hennessy
>
>
------------------------------