[Possible Spam(low)]-[B-R-I] Re: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy...

Dave Doherty dave@skywaves.net
Wed Sep 13 22:48:06 EDT 2017


I noticed a similar improbability on another NOV in Louisiana.

It appears that somebody in the Enforcement Bureau has trouble with scaling.

-d

-----Original Message-----
From: Boston-Radio-Interest [mailto:boston-radio-interest-bounces@lists.BostonRadio.org] On Behalf Of Kaimbridge M. GoldChild
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 2:39 PM
To: Boston Radio Interest <Boston-Radio-Interest@Lists.BostonRadio.org>
Subject: [Possible Spam(low)]-[B-R-I] Re: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy...

Something ainʼt kosher here.

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346669A1.pdf

9A1> The field strength of your signal on frequency 101.3 MHz was 
9A1> measured at 59,282 microvolts per meter (μV/m) at 202 meters, which 
9A1> exceeded the
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
9A1> maximum permitted level of 250 μV/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices.



https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346668A1.pdf

8A1> The field strength of your signal on frequency 105.3 MHz was 
8A1> measured at 80,583 microvolts per meter (μV/m) at 202 meters, which 
8A1> exceeded the
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
8A1> maximum permitted level of 250 μV/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices.



https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346671A1.pdf

1A1> the field strength of your signal on frequency 104.7 MHz was 
1A1> measured at 102,815 microvolts per meter (μV/m) at 3,135 meters, 
1A1> which exceeded the
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^!!!
1A1> maximum permitted level of 250 μV/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices.

So, 101.3 MHz ≈ 59 mV/m at 202 m, 105.3 MHz ≈ 81 mV/m and 104.7 MHz ≈ 103 mV/m at over 3 km?!?  I donʼt think so!
The one on 104.7 is nowhere as strong as the other two, and was measured over 15 times further away!
Me thinks there is a typo somewheres?  Maybe they meant 103 mV/m at 313.5 m (though even that still seems a little too strong, compared to the other two)?
FWIW, 105.3 seems to have been a dead carrier for the past few days (they have been with a dc for hr.s at a time in the past, but not for days).

      ~Kaimbridge~

-- -- --
      Wiki—Sites Contribution History Pages:

        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
          math.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
  wiki.gis.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
         rosettacode.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge

      *****  Void Where Permitted; Limit 0 Per Customer.  *****







More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest mailing list