[B-R-I] Re: The FCC Enforcement Bureau Has Been Busy...
Kaimbridge M. GoldChild
Kaimbridge@Gmail.com
Wed Sep 13 14:38:53 EDT 2017
Something ainʼt kosher here.
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346669A1.pdf
9A1> The field strength of your signal on frequency 101.3 MHz was measured
9A1> at 59,282 microvolts per meter (μV/m) at 202 meters, which exceeded the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
9A1> maximum permitted level of 250 μV/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices.
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346668A1.pdf
8A1> The field strength of your signal on frequency 105.3 MHz was measured
8A1> at 80,583 microvolts per meter (μV/m) at 202 meters, which exceeded the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
8A1> maximum permitted level of 250 μV/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices.
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-346671A1.pdf
1A1> the field strength of your signal on frequency 104.7 MHz was measured
1A1> at 102,815 microvolts per meter (μV/m) at 3,135 meters, which exceeded the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^!!!
1A1> maximum permitted level of 250 μV/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices.
So, 101.3 MHz ≈ 59 mV/m at 202 m, 105.3 MHz ≈ 81 mV/m and 104.7 MHz ≈ 103 mV/m
at over 3 km?!? I donʼt think so!
The one on 104.7 is nowhere as strong as the other two, and was measured
over 15 times further away!
Me thinks there is a typo somewheres? Maybe they meant 103 mV/m at 313.5 m
(though even that still seems a little too strong, compared to the other two)?
FWIW, 105.3 seems to have been a dead carrier for the past few days (they
have been with a dc for hr.s at a time in the past, but not for days).
~Kaimbridge~
-- -- --
Wiki—Sites Contribution History Pages:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
math.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
wiki.gis.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
rosettacode.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
***** Void Where Permitted; Limit 0 Per Customer. *****
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list