WLLH Lawrence...and just Lawrence

[Paul B. Walker, Jr.]

second tenant? If the translator is owned by the am licensee, thats not a
second tenant. there's a difference between second tenant and second piece
of equipment


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Gary's Ice Cream <gary@garysicecream.com>
wrote:

> I just read through a copy of the lease for the site..... it doesn't say
> anything about allowing a second tenant on the tower.  Maybe I found a
> technicality.
>
>                     Gary's Ice Cream, Chelmsford, MA
> www.garysicecream.com           www.icecreamcollege.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boston-Radio-Interest
> [mailto:boston-radio-interest-bounces@lists.BostonRadio.org] On Behalf Of
> Jeff Lehmann
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 12:16 PM
> To: billohno@gmail.com
> Cc: Boston Radio Group
> Subject: Re: WLLH Lawrence...and just Lawrence
>
> No I don't think so, since it's on the Lowell tower, I was just curious if
> the current location happened to still be close enough.
>
> Perhaps they could move it closer to Lawrence (like the 99.5 tower, where
> the new LPFM licensed to Lawrence on 98.1 is), and be within the 1400
> Lawrence contour, and then put a good signal over both cities...
>
> Jeff Lehmann
>
> > On Nov 15, 2016, at 12:01 PM, "billohno@gmail.com" <billohno@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > So, the 95.1 contour was predicated on both the Lawrence and Lowell AM
> footprints? If so, then very interesting move.
> >
> > Bill O'Neill
> >
> > Sent from my mobile.
> >
> >> On Nov 15, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Jeff Lehmann <jjlehmann@comcast.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Would the 95.1 translator, which is now their primary focus in Lowell,
> still be within the contour for a Lawrence-only WLLH?
> >>
> >> If so, I think that's the answer.
> >>
> >> Jeff Lehmann
> >>
> >>> On Nov 14, 2016, at 11:42 PM, Scott Fybush <scott@fybush.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Guess what the Merrimack Valley's oldest station quietly filed for?
> They're proposing to turn off the Lowell transmitter, relicense WLLH just
> to
> Lawrence, and use the existing Lawrence synchronous rooftop site as the
> one-and-only WLLH site.
> >>>
> >>> Wonder why?
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>