Delay on WODS-HD3

Dave Tomm
Sat Feb 14 00:25:54 EST 2009

I haven't gotten an HD radio yet, so most of the time in my home  
office I just stream WBZ from I-Tunes.  It's just easier and sounds  
better than OTA....

-Dave Tomm

On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote:

> <<On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:40:19 -0500, Aaron Read < 
> > said:
>> Question for those of you in Boston: which sounds the best?  WODS- 
>> HD3,
>> WBZ-AM or WBZ-AM-HD?   I mean, of course each sounds DIFFERENT, but
>> which sounds the best to your ears and why?
> WODS-HD3 definitely sounds better than regular WBZ here, but that's in
> part because the only radio that gets an acceptable analog signal is
> my Sony 2010, and I have to keep it on narrow filter to avoid an
> irritating heterodyne.  I do think it's too bassy; I wonder if they're
> using the same processing as the analog.  I can't decode WBZ's HD
> here -- too much QRM.
> -GAWollman

More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest mailing list