Is WBZ the only TV and AM left in New England?
Sun Nov 16 23:58:10 EST 2008
<<On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:55:26 -0500, Scott Fybush <email@example.com> said:
> As Garrett alluded to in his response, most of these (Hubbard, Glendive
> and Fisher being the exceptions) are old-line newspaper companies that
> expanded into broadcasting.
Actually, I was alluding to the fact that they were all relatively
small group owners with a strong connection to the specific market in
which they kept their original radio-TV combos -- you could certainly
say that about Fisher and Hubbard as well. It's perhaps particularly
instructive when you consider that Hearst sold off *all* their radio
properties, with the exception of WBAL/WIYY. I believe that's true of
a number of the other operators on the list. (Did Tribune ever own
radio outside Chicago? I have a bit set that they did, but it could
just be cosmic rays.)
If you go back about fifteen years, before all the big group roll-ups,
there were a good number more, in similar situations.
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest