credit where credit is due
Donna Halper
dlh@donnahalper.com
Sun Sep 24 03:12:21 EDT 2006
>it was written--
>
>Two liberals that appear to know how to be entertaining is Stephanie Miller
>and Keith Olberman (now that his show is openly courting anti-O'reilly
>factor viewers.)
>
>Donna, I'd be interested in knowing your opinion of Randi Rhodes show...
Keith Olbermann is my cultural hero these days-- not because he is a
liberal but because he is INTERESTING -- an articulate and passionate
critic of this president's policies who knows how to state his case
without devolving into pointless ranting. And yes, I find his Jon
Stewart-like sarcasm can be very amusing at times, because some
politicians really are ridiculous and deserve a little ribbing from
media critics. Keith may have liberal politics, but he will
criticise Democrats who act stooopidly just as quickly as he will
criticise Republicans. But overall, I hear waaaay too much ranting
coming from both sides, and I am not fond of it. Whether it's
Michael Savage or Hugh Hewitt from the right or, sad to say, Randi
Rhodes from the left, the one-note samba rapidly becomes tedious for
me. I understand-- Michael and Hugh hate liberals with a passion,
and Randi hates Bush and Cheney just as much. Okay fine, now that
you guys have all made your point-- how do we fill the rest of the
show? I used to find Randi a lot more interesting, but as time has
passed, she seems to be really stuck in her intense dislike of the
Bush White House-- which is her privilege but doesn't make her show
very interesting. She's very bright and very determined, but a good
show has to have some variety. I have the same problem with Savage--
oh my gawd, can we do one show without calling liberals "communists"
or saying they all hate America? At least Stephanie and Keith (and
to some degree Ed Schultz and Thom Hartmann) know how to express
their views without becoming boring and monochromatic. I like a host
who avoids being totally predictable, and I like a host who can do
more than spew endless insults. As I have said many times, I am
politically a moderate-- conservative on a few issues, liberal on
others. But when I listen to radio, I want to be informed and
entertained, no matter whose show I tune in. Not all the right
wingers know how to do that kind of show, nor do many of the left
wingers. And as anyone who has tried it will tell you, doing an
interesting talk show is harder than it might seem.
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list