CFRB
Scott Fybush
scott@fybush.com
Tue Nov 18 12:17:18 EST 2003
At 10:53 AM 11/18/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Maybe Scott would know, but why didn't CFRB jump at the chance to apply
>for 740 when it opened up? (Same could be asked why CJAD didn't try to
>move to 940)
Excellent question, and one I've not been able to answer to my
satisfaction. But here are my best guesses:
1. At the time, both CFRB and CJAD had just completed major improvements to
their existing facilities on 1010 and 800. CFRB, as you may recall, worked
out a mutual-interference agreement with WINS in the mid-90s that allowed
both stations to rebuild their antenna systems to better cover their home
markets (at the expense of, well, ME - Rochester is right in the middle of
the new interference zone created between the stations). CJAD lost its
towers in the 1998 ice storm and spent a lot of money rebuilding and
improving them (Garrett and I saw the engineer's book of before-and-after
photos when we visited the CJAD site in the summer of 1999.) So I'm
guessing that Standard was loath to walk away from those facilities so soon
after pouring lots of cash into them.
2. CFRB, as Dan alluded to earlier, holds a marker of sorts with the
Canadian government for the eventual use of 860 in Toronto. During the
CBC's signal expansion in the forties, the government took the I-A facility
on 860 away from CFRB and swapped it with the lesser facility on 1010 that
had been the CBC's secondary outlet, CBY. Supposedly, a part of the deal
with CFRB gave it the right to return to 860 with 50kw ND-U if the CBC ever
stopped using that frequency. Would a CFRB application for 740 void that
agreement? Who knows...
3. The CRTC probably wouldn't have given either station the better facility
even if they had applied. The motivation at the CRTC was to increase the
choices available to local listeners, especially in Toronto, and the
promise of standards on 740 and all-news on 940 was undoubtedly more
appealing to them than the chance to give already-dominant 'RB and CJAD a
slight signal improvement. (Note that Metromedia, which did get 940 and 690
in Montreal, did not simply apply to move its existing CIQC and CKVL over
to the new frequencies, an application that would almost surely have been
rejected - they proposed the new all-news formats instead, effectively
relaunching 940 and 690 as new stations.)
4. And it would have been only a SLIGHT signal improvement in the core of
each market. Both 'RB and CJAD do just fine covering their home markets
with their existing signals. Adding listeners outside the home market is
even less valuable in Canada than in the US, since the BBM doesn't even
report listening to out-of-market signals (which makes the Hamilton
ratings, for instance, look distinctly odd - you can tell that something
like half the market's radio listening is missing, but you can only guess
at which Toronto signals it's going to. And yes, Hamilton is a separate
radio market from Toronto.)
5. Anyway, AM is going away in Canada - right? At least from the CRTC's
perspective, the future of broadcast radio in Canada is the Eureka-147 DAB
system (Garrett, you can stop laughing now...)
And whatever Eureka's flaws may be, it does provide signal parity across
the market. The digital transmitters for CJAD and CFRB get out precisely as
well (or as poorly) as the digital transmitters for CHWO and CINW, the
eventual winners of 740 and 940. This may even matter, someday.
Those are my best guesses...
s
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list