[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Marshfield cable TV controversy

To: <boston-radio-interest@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, David Moisan <dmoisan@davidmoisan.org>, <rogerkirk@mail.ttlc.net>
Subject: Re: Marshfield cable TV controversy
From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@attorneyross.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:58:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <200310221413.AA109380174@mail.ttlc.net>
Organization: Law Office of A. Joseph Ross, J.D.
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On 22 Oct 2003 at 14:13, rogerkirk wrote:

> I left the below message intact, to show what 
> verbiage has tripped the "XXX" wire on my SPAM 
> filters.  The slope must be getting slippery.
 
I'm guessing it was the word n-a-k-e-d.  I'm also guessing that with hyphens, it won't trip the 
filters.

-- 
A. Joseph Ross, J.D.                           617.367.0468
 15 Court Square, Suite 210                 lawyer@attorneyross.com
Boston, MA 02108-2503           	         http://www.attorneyross.com

References:
- Re: Marshfield cable TV controversy
  - From: "rogerkirk" <rogerkirk@mail.ttlc.net>

Prev by Date: Fwd: Voice from the past
Next by Date: How to improve TV newscasts?
Previous by thread: Re: Marshfield cable TV controversy
Next by thread: Class A AMs and their owners - 1983 edition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread