[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A favor
At 11:15 PM 10/14/03 -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
><<On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:28:08 -0400, Ron Bello <RBello@BelloAssoc.com> said:
>
> > Twice in the last week when leaving a relative's home,
> > trying to listen to the Red Sox game after sundown
> > there was virtually no signal for WEEI on the northern
> > side of Sudbury on route 27.
>
>Interesting. Where I live in Framingham, pretty much on the
>Needham-Denver axis, the 850 signal is quite serviceable. (Certainly
>by comparison to the 680 signal which at times is totally trashed.)
>The 850 night field in the direction of Acton is about eight times
>what it is toward me, but Acton is also about twice as far away, so
>Kevin's informant should be getting twice the signal, although that
>direction is on the cusp of the nighttime null. (WYLF is a
>well-known offender.)
The Acton side of Sudbury is where I started and could not receive WEEI.
Going south on route 27 the signal got stronger. This seems to be the
opposite
of what is above.
- References:
- Re: A favor
- From: Ron Bello <RBello@BelloAssoc.com>
- A favor
- From: "Kevin Vahey" <kvahey@tmail.com>
- Re: A favor
- From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>