[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: VPR repeaters

To: billo@shoreham.net, "'Boston Radio Interest (E-mail)'" <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
Subject: RE: VPR repeaters
From: Larry Weil <kc1ih@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:25:00 -0400
In-reply-to: <000001c37faf$976467d0$9f00a8c0@boneill>
References: <6.0.0.22.2.20030920152017.02484418@mail.mac.com><000001c37faf$976467d0$9f00a8c0@boneill>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

At 03:44 PM 9/20/2003, Bill O'Neill wrote:
> > This is rather ironic, considering how strongly NPR was
> > opposed to the
> > establishment of LPFM, and how they encouraged their
> > affiliates to take the
> > same position.  Does anyone know if VPR took a strong
> > anti-LPFM position?
> >
>Larry Weil
> > Lake Wobegone, NH
>
>They could be repeaters vs. LPFMs.  (Does that change the question?)

Yes.  It would make my question irrelevant.


--
Larry Weil
Lake Wobegone, NH

References:
- Re: VPR repeaters
  - From: Larry Weil <kc1ih@mac.com>
- RE: VPR repeaters
  - From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@shoreham.net>

Prev by Date: Dick Johnson, Hall of Fame !!!
Next by Date: WUMB Boston Folk Festival
Previous by thread: RE: VPR repeaters
Next by thread: Re: VPR repeaters
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread