Re: Non-competes

["rogerkirk" <rogerkirk@mail.ttlc.net>]

SteveOrdinetz wrote:

>I heard it too, and I'm not sure either.  At first I thought it was 
>some sort of feature (which I suppose is/was the point).  It's even 
>more confusing than that one for the purple pill where you hear a 
>bunch of random party conversation then the announcer asks if you've 
>spoken to your doctor about today's purple pill.  Not sure if the tv 
>version makes any more sense.

I suspect it's more about branding.

The thrust of my original post was that a non-compete contract
is being used as an employee intimidation tool - just the kind
of thing that re-inforces the "corporate America is bad" ideas.