[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Non-competes

To: <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>, SteveOrdinetz <steveord@bit-net.com>, <rogerkirk@mail.ttlc.net>
Subject: Re: Non-competes
From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@attorneyross.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:28:18 -0400
In-reply-to: <200309190905.AA131924000@mail.ttlc.net>
Organization: Law Office of A. Joseph Ross, J.D.
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On 19 Sep 2003 at 9:05, rogerkirk wrote:

> I suspect it's more about branding.
> 
> The thrust of my original post was that a non-compete contract
> is being used as an employee intimidation tool - just the kind
> of thing that re-inforces the "corporate America is bad" ideas.

Oh, I understood your original thrust.  But it seems awfully strange to me that someone 
would pay for an ad that leaves the listener wondering what product it's trying to sell.

-- 
A. Joseph Ross, J.D.                           617.367.0468
 15 Court Square, Suite 210                 lawyer@attorneyross.com
Boston, MA 02108-2503           	         http://www.attorneyross.com

References:
- Re: Non-competes
  - From: "rogerkirk" <rogerkirk@mail.ttlc.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Non-competes
Next by Date: Re: Non-competes
Previous by thread: Re: Non-competes
Next by thread: Re: Non-competes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread