[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Tower question

To: "Garrett Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: RE: Tower question
From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@shoreham.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:05:29 -0400
Cc: "Boston Radio Interest" <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200307141713.h6EHD5xM099542@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Reply-to: <billo@shoreham.net>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

> As someone else noted, the FM bays on the top are 100 kW of 98.9
> WOKO.  WJOY 1230 is skirted along the lower part of the tower.  Before
> WOKO's upgrade to 100 kW, the tower was much shorter and thinner, and
> I believe the tower was hot with WJOY.
>
> -GAWollman

The interesting thing is that WOKO proves that even a 100 kW flamethrower can't
compete with green mountains!  There are FMers with far lower ERP that go
greater distance, given a more generous ERP.

Bill O'Neill

References:
- Tower question
  - From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: RIP Ernie Boch
Next by Date: RE: RIP Ernie Boch
Previous by thread: Tower question
Next by thread: FW: Tower question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread