RE: When did they move to their current TX location...?

["Paul Hopfgarten" <paul@03038.com>]

I want to know how a station licensed to Lawrence can have it's stick in
Boston. Can't be THAT weak of a signal.

If 62 is considered a "Boston" station, then would not also 27 and 66 be
"Estations de Boston"?

And how about ShopNBC-46? (WWDP??)

Paul Hopfgarten
East Derry NH 03041
paul@03038.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
> [mailto:owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org]On Behalf Of Garrett
> Wollman
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:11 PM
> To: Peter Q. George
> Cc: Shawn Mamros; Joseph Pappalardo; BRI
> Subject: Re: When did they move to their current TX location...?
>
>
> <<On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:53:19 -0700 (PDT), "Peter Q. George"
> <radiojunkie3@yahoo.com> said:
>
> > Channel 68 still has the weakest UHF signal in the
> > market.
>
> You don't think 62 from One Beacon St. wins that crown?
>
> -GAWollman
> (on vacation in Western New York)
>