[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WBUR takes on Clear Channel

To: bri@bostonradio.org
Subject: Re: WBUR takes on Clear Channel
From: Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 15:48:15 -0500
In-reply-to: <003301c2f88f$9f2b1dd0$3dc905cf@yourm3vezyx8af>
References: <3E897695.29377.5B37D1@localhost><5.2.0.9.0.20030401134200.019ffb80@mail.speakeasy.net><5.2.0.9.0.20030401153759.01a03f30@mail.speakeasy.net>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

At 03:45 PM 4/1/2003 -0500, Dan Billings wrote:
>A better example than NPR is the television networks where most stations
>juts turn the programming over to the network for most of the day.  I don't
>think it would make an significant difference in programming if the networks
>owned all their affiliates.
>
>-- Dan Billings, Bowdoinham, Maine

Yes, I agree with you on that one.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron "Bishop" Read             aread@speakeasy.net
FriedBagels Consulting          AOL-IM: readaaron
http://www.friedbagels.com      Boston, MA

References:
- Re: WBUR takes on Clear Channel
  - From: "Mark Laurence" <mlaurence@mindspring.com>
- RE: WBUR takes on Clear Channel
  - From: Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net>
- Re: WBUR takes on Clear Channel
  - From: Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net>
- Re: WBUR takes on Clear Channel
  - From: "Dan Billings" <billings@suscom-maine.net>

Prev by Date: Re: WBUR takes on Clear Channel
Next by Date: WBPS Has Apparently Replaced Hannity
Previous by thread: Re: WBUR takes on Clear Channel
Next by thread: Re: WBUR takes on Clear Channel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread