[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: A real EAS system

To: Sid Schweiger <sid@wrko.com>
Subject: RE: A real EAS system
From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:44:35 -0500 (EST)
Cc: wollman@lcs.mit.edu, <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
In-reply-to: <se79fc6a.004@entbalhs1>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Sid Schweiger wrote:
> Because the number that usually followed the 54 with the smaller 4 was 6, 7 or 8, depending on how small the dial was.  Following 54 with an obviously smaller number wouldn't have made any sense, but you couldn't put a 5 (500 kHz) in there because the AM band doesn't go down that far.

Some do 5.3 or 5.4 instead of 5 superscript-4.

--
Sven (At 1750 on your dial, just above the police calls baby!!)

Wonderful WINO RADIO!!!

References:
- RE: A real EAS system
  - From: "Sid Schweiger" <sid@wrko.com>

Prev by Date: RE: A real EAS system
Next by Date: RE: A real EAS system
Previous by thread: RE: A real EAS system
Next by thread: RE: A real EAS system
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread