[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re:WMTW & pregnancy

To: "Dan Billings" <billings@suscom-maine.net>, "Dave Faneuf" <tklaundry@juno.com>
Subject: Re: Re:WMTW & pregnancy
From: Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:10:15 -0500
Cc: <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
In-reply-to: <001c01c2d6f8$cc30d120$3dc905cf@yourm3vezyx8af>
References: <20030217.214426.1592.14355@webmail5.nyc.untd.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

At 09:52 PM 2/17/2003 -0500, Dan Billings wrote:
> > Dave:
> > I think you have to consider the time frame, when Nat & Chet conceived
>Anchor Baby it was 20+ years ago, also perhaps all members of their family
>had not been informed.  It really wasn't up to Tom Ellis to break the news.
> > df
>
>I understand all that.  I was pointing out how far things have come.  Today
>Natalie could be having an ultrasound on TV!

Frankly...an ultrasound on TV raises my eyebrow less than Katie Couric 
getting a colonoscopy on national TV.

Not that either really raises my eyebrows, to be honest.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron "Bishop" Read             aread@speakeasy.net
FriedBagels Consulting          AOL-IM: readaaron
http://www.friedbagels.com      Boston, MA

References:
- Re:WMTW & pregnancy
  - From: Dave Faneuf <tklaundry@juno.com>
- Re: Re:WMTW & pregnancy
  - From: "Dan Billings" <billings@suscom-maine.net>

Prev by Date: When Radio Was
Next by Date: Re: WMTW & pregnancy
Previous by thread: RE: Re:WMTW & pregnancy
Next by thread: Re:Re: WMTW & pregnancy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread