[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re:WMTW & pregnancy

To: "'Dan Billings'" <billings@suscom-maine.net>, "'Dave Faneuf'" <tklaundry@juno.com>
Subject: RE: Re:WMTW & pregnancy
From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@shoreham.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:00:41 -0500
Cc: <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <001c01c2d6f8$cc30d120$3dc905cf@yourm3vezyx8af>
Reply-to: <billo@shoreham.net>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

> > Dave:
> > I think you have to consider the time frame, when Nat & 
> Chet conceived
> Anchor Baby it was 20+ years ago, also perhaps all members of 
> their family
> had not been informed.  It really wasn't up to Tom Ellis to 
> break the news.
> > df

Dan:
> I understand all that.  I was pointing out how far things 
> have come.  Today
> Natalie could be having an ultrasound on TV!

Ah, just think. TV by 2037 will feature news anchor baby conceptions.  

Bill O'Neill

References:
- Re: Re:WMTW & pregnancy
  - From: "Dan Billings" <billings@suscom-maine.net>

Prev by Date: Re: WMTW & pregnancy
Next by Date: When Radio Was
Previous by thread: Re: Re:WMTW & pregnancy
Next by thread: Re: Re:WMTW & pregnancy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread