[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What's up with WWKB?

To: "Sean Smyth" <ssmyth@suscom.net>
Subject: Re: What's up with WWKB?
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:21:05 -0500 (EST)
Cc: <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
In-reply-to: <001501c2d443$27f10740$f04a4e40@suscom.net>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20030214091058.00a81870@pop3.bit-net.com><001501c2d443$27f10740$f04a4e40@suscom.net>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:07:20 -0500, "Sean Smyth" <ssmyth@suscom.net> said:

> picking up WSAI Cincinnati, which is at *1530*, not 1520. The format you
> describe seems like them. They are airing standards most of the day and have
> some preachers with time left on their contracts to buy overnight time. I
> understand WSAI is going to allow the contracts to lapse and go music 24-7.

WSAI is *not* running standards; WSAI is running oldies (and is
imaging that way).

-GAWollman

References:
- Re: What's up with WWKB?
  - From: SteveOrdinetz <steveord@bit-net.com>
- Re: What's up with WWKB?
  - From: "Sean Smyth" <ssmyth@suscom.net>

Prev by Date: Re: WCDJ 102.3
Next by Date: Re: WABC IMISSEDIT NEWS
Previous by thread: Re: What's up with WWKB?
Next by thread: RE: What's up with WWKB?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread