RE: Re:Re:Wired.com on Reversing Consolidation

["Paul Hopfgarten" <paul@03038.com>]

Which is further from COL in miles, WROR or WQSX? (WKLB's tower is actually
not to far from Lowell)

Paul Hopfgarten
East Derry NH 03041
paul@03038.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
> [mailto:owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org]On Behalf Of Garrett
> Wollman
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:16 PM
> To: Dave Faneuf
> Cc: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
> Subject: Re: Re:Re:Wired.com on Reversing Consolidation
>
>
> <<On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:40:34 -0500, Dave Faneuf
> <tklaundry@juno.com> said:
>
> > They have always been part of the Boston market for ratings
> purposes, but
> > back in the old days they served the communities of license and nearby
> > communities.
>
> As far as the Commission is concerned, they (meaning WQSX, WKLB-FM,
> and WROR-FM) still do serve their communities of license, by
> irradiating them with an electric field which exceeds 3.16 mV/m in 50%
> of locations at least 50% of the time.
>
> In any event, you continue to miss my point, which is that it's not at
> all comparable to the sort of move-outs done in Texas.  Those stations
> were *moved out* of their markets.  Not the studios, the transmitters.
>
> -GAWollman
>