[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: monopoly definition

To: "Sean Smyth" <ssmyth@suscom.net>
Subject: Re: monopoly definition
From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@attorneyross.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:01:55 -0400
Cc: <bri@bostonradio.org>
In-reply-to: <007601c2785a$dd23dce0$714b4e40@suscom.net>
Organization: Law Office of A. Joseph Ross, J.D.
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On 20 Oct 2002 at 13:05, Sean Smyth wrote:

> In 1952, was our country as litiguous as it is now? No? The way I
> understood it, everyone in Boston wasn't too worried about the Braves
> leaving, they were confident another NL team would come here shortly. And
> I also believe that, at the time, WNAC (1260) was airing some games for
> both the Sox and Braves...the Braves ditching town probably didn't matter
> too much to them, as they could just add more Sox games?
 
I believe that WHDH was carrying Red Sox games on radio and channel 4 on television.

I've never heard that anyone thought another NL team would come to Boston.  After all, no 
teams in either league had moved for 50 years.

-- 
A. Joseph Ross, J.D.                           617.367.0468
 15 Court Square, Suite 210                 lawyer@attorneyross.com
Boston, MA 02108-2503           	         http://www.attorneyross.com

References:
- Re: monopoly definition
  - From: "Sean Smyth" <ssmyth@suscom.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Oldies Stations and 1950s music
Next by Date: RE: Oldies Stations and 1950s music
Previous by thread: Re: monopoly definition
Next by thread: Re: monopoly definition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread