[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Good Hub FM Raception

To: <Patriotsrule417@prodigy.net>
Subject: RE: Good Hub FM Raception
From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@attorneyross.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 23:16:46 -0500
CC: boston Radio Interest <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
In-reply-to: <LPBBKDJNKFELLECCJMNBAEOLCGAA.Patriotsrule417@prodigy.net>
Organization: Law Office of A. Joseph Ross, J.D.
References: <001101c17a73$2c6c3040$282c96d1@oemcomputer>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On 1 Dec 2001 at 12:21, Patriotsrule417@prodigy.net wrote:

> Suprisingly, around 8:45 this morning I was listening to WTAM-AM 1100 from
> Cleveland clear on my radio.
 
Adam, I thought you knew by now that long-distance reception like that on 
AM really isn't all that surprising.  Now, if you got an FM station from 
Cleveland ...

===========================================================
 A. Joseph Ross, J.D.                                         
617.367.0468
  15 Court Square, Suite 210                      lawyer@attorneyross.com
 Boston, MA 02108-2503           	         http://www.attorneyross.com
===========================================================

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Good Hub FM Raception
  - From: Aaron Read <aread@speakeasy.net>

References:
- Re: Good Hub FM Raception
  - From: Brian Anastasi <anastasi@javanet.com>
- RE: Good Hub FM Raception
  - From: <Patriotsrule417@prodigy.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Who rules Canadian Bdcasting
Next by Date: Re: NY Times Story on NYC Transmitters on City Island (Registration Required)
Previous by thread: RE: Good Hub FM Raception
Next by thread: RE: Good Hub FM Raception
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread