[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tech question (Was Re: WBZ stereo?)

To: Dave Faneuf <tklaundry@juno.com>, mmkc@mediaone.net
Subject: Re: Tech question (Was Re: WBZ stereo?)
From: Larry Weil <kc1ih@mediaone.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 15:08:41 -0500
Cc: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-Reply-To: <20011105.133054.-88705777.8.tklaundry@juno.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

At 01:30 PM 11/5/01 -0500, Dave Faneuf wrote:


>On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:53:34 -0500 "Marc Lemay" <mmkc@mediaone.net>
>writes:
> > Does an FM mono signal travel better than an FM Stereo signal?  If so
> > - why?
> >

It's not that a mono signal will travel further, but that a receiver will 
seem more sensitive to a mono signal, since there is noise generated from 
the stereo subcarrier when the signal is weak.
---
Larry Weil
Lake Wobegone, NH

References:
- Re: Tech question (Was Re: WBZ stereo?)
  - From: Dave Faneuf <tklaundry@juno.com>

Prev by Date: Re: WBZ stereo?
Next by Date: Re: WBZ stereo?
Previous by thread: Re: Tech question (Was Re: WBZ stereo?)
Next by thread: Re: Tech question (Was Re: WBZ stereo?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread