> On 30 Oct 2001 at 13:41, Dave Faneuf wrote:
> > really wasn't in the mood to read all the abusive messages ripping him a
> > new &^$(%&
I guess in this case, two &^$(%& aren't better than one? :-P
--
Sven Franklyn Weil "The needs of the many outweigh
<sven@gordsven.com> the needs of the few
<http://www.gordsven.com/sven> or the one."
-- Surak