[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boston Safe For Ten More Years

To: <lglavin@lycos.com>
Subject: Re: Boston Safe For Ten More Years
From: DonKelley@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:30:30 EDT
Cc: <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

lglavin said that...

>rronline.com reports that Boston has
>indeed 
>moved down the food-chain, but is safely ensconsed at >number eight.  I
>thought Atlanta and Houston might surpass Boston but >it didn't happen (all
>those
>uncounted illegals in TX).

Actually neither happened.  Boston did not move down the food chain - the metro population went up by 130,000 and the rank (#8) was unchanged, as noted.  

Dallas-Forth Worth (#6-#5) moved ahead of Philadelphia (#5-#6). Washington DC moved ahead of Boston (#9-#7), but Detroit (#7-#10) fell behind Boston and Houston (#10-#9).

Ten years is not a factor in market rank.  Arbitron revises population estimates every fall, so positions can change again a year from now.

Prev by Date: All of the radio news from the Springfield area
Next by Date: RE: All of the radio news from the Springfield area
Previous by thread: Re: Boston Safe For Ten More Years
Next by thread: WLTI/WJUL looking for alumni
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread