[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Satellite radio

To: "Hakim Madjid" <HMadjid@mindspring.com>
Subject: RE: Satellite radio
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 17:09:29 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
In-Reply-To: <NAECJPFKAIPCPAGANDKFEEENCGAA.HMadjid@mindspring.com>
References: <3BB0D3F4.6080203@biochem.bumc.bu.edu><NAECJPFKAIPCPAGANDKFEEENCGAA.HMadjid@mindspring.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:23:37 -0400, "Hakim Madjid" <HMadjid@mindspring.com> said:

> satellite antenna. IMHO they're blowing it on this one - having the required
> antenna a $100 add - on.

I think they're trying to talk a good game as far as aftermarket
receivers go but don't really expect to sell many.  The real win for
XMSR is when every GM luxury car comes with one of their receivers
built in.  If the feature is popular, it will be made available as a
factory-installed option down the line.

-GAWollman

References:
- Satellite radio
  - From: Tony Abruzzese <abruzzese@biochem.bumc.bu.edu>
- RE: Satellite radio
  - From: "Hakim Madjid" <HMadjid@mindspring.com>
- RE: Satellite radio
  - From: "Hakim Madjid" <HMadjid@mindspring.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Satellite radio
Next by Date: Re: 1690 pirate?
Previous by thread: Re: Satellite radio
Next by thread: RE: Satellite radio
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread