[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: no bleep, General

To: Richard Chonak <rac@gabriel.cambridge.ma.us>
Subject: Re: no bleep, General
From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 20:24:59 -0400 (EDT)
cc: boston-radio-interest@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200109122344.f8CNiD532341@gabriel.gabriel.cambridge.ma.us>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Richard Chonak wrote:
> mentions another case where TV let harsh language go out over the
> air unfiltered.   
> 

I personally think that when dealing with a story of this magnitude,
occasional foul language that slips through is not the most important or
most critical of things.  

I don't think anyone's going to care or mind
that the words "holy shit" or "bastards" slipped by a profanity-censoring
device.

I know I don't (mind, that is).
-- 
Sven Franklyn Weil            "The needs of the many outweigh 
<sven@gordsven.com>                      the needs of the few
<http://www.gordsven.com/sven>                   or the one." 
                                                     -- Surak

References:
- no bleep, General
  - From: Richard Chonak <rac@gabriel.cambridge.ma.us>

Prev by Date: RE: Coverage of Press Conference
Next by Date: Re: no bleep, General
Previous by thread: no bleep, General
Next by thread: Re: no bleep, General
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread