[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: WCLV-FM Cleveland Makes Frequency Switch and Courageously Accepts Criticism
Well on alternative would be something along the lines of the British
model - a government chartered broadcasting corporation, [such as the BBC]
and then charge listeners/TV-viewers a yearly license fee to fund it.
Mind you, of course, there are a number of commercial stations in the UK,
also.
73, de Hakim (N1ZFF)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
[mailto:owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org]On Behalf Of
Jibguy@aol.com
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 12:03 AM
To: sven@gordsven.com; dib9@gwi.net
Cc: lawyer@attorneyross.com; boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
Subject: Re: WCLV-FM Cleveland Makes Frequency Switch and Courageously
Accepts Criticism
In a message dated 7/12/01 10:56:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
sven@gordsven.com writes:
<< The worst thing we could do was
when in the beginning we decided that radio should be an advertiser-funded
business. >>
Is there a better way? - I can't imagine ALL stations doing "the WGBH
thing"....
----jibguy