[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Pohistorynow.com on clear channels
Of course the orginal rationale for havnig clear channel stations has long
since disappeared.
73, de Hakim (N1ZFF)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
[mailto:owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org]On Behalf Of Dan
Strassberg
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 4:29 PM
To: lglavin@lycos.com; boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
Subject: Re: Pohistorynow.com on clear channels
I went to the URL you included below and searched for "clear channel". No
luck turning up ther article to which you alluded. In the future, how about
_deep_ URLs to articles you cite?
--
Dan Strassberg, dan.strassberg@worldnet.att.net
Phone: 1-617-558-4205, eFax: 1-707-215-6367
-----Original Message-----
From: Laurence Glavin <lglavin@lycos.com>
To: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
<boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
Date: Sunday, May 27, 2001 1:59 PM
Subject: Pohistorynow.com on clear channels
>This week's edition of www.pophistorynow.com documents the
>FCC's decision 20 years ago to allow stations around the country
>to operate on the formerly clear channels.