[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage

To: Shawn Mamros <mamros@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 12:23:22 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-Reply-To: <200105031609.MAA09722@ten-thousand-dollar-bill.mit.edu>
References: <200105031422.KAA05579@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu><200105031609.MAA09722@ten-thousand-dollar-bill.mit.edu>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Thu, 03 May 2001 12:09:34 -0400, Shawn Mamros <mamros@MIT.EDU> said:

> Consolidation could never have occurred if the "small-time" guys
> hadn't sold out.

If they were investor-owned corporations or partnerships, as a good
number of them were, they may well have had a legal obligation to sell
out.

-GAWollman

References:
- Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
  - From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>
- Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
  - From: Shawn Mamros <mamros@MIT.EDU>
- Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
  - From: Shawn Mamros <mamros@MIT.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
Next by Date: Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
Previous by thread: Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
Next by thread: Re: Telecommunications Act (Lack of) Coverage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread