[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now

To: Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com>
Subject: Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
From: Sven Franklyn Weil <sven@gordsven.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 11:17:36 -0400 (EDT)
cc: boston-radio-interest@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20010501035447.02523e80@127.0.0.1>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On Tue, 1 May 2001, Donna Halper wrote:
> by the Republican congress, who have received MILLIONS in donations and 
> contributions from the NAB and various companies like Clear 
> Channel.

Weren't these the same people responsible for killing LPFM?  Clinton could
still have vetoed it and then let the Congress try to over-ride. He  could
have done that to make a statement and get people up in arms, because that
veto would have made the news.

Telecom 96 was pretty quiet stuff....I don't remember much noise being
made about it.

Sven F. Weil
email: sven@chookus.com
WWW homepage:  http://home.gordsven.com/gordsven/sven
RadioLand Site:  http://home.gordsven.com/gordsven/sven/radiomuseum.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
  - From: "Hakim Madjid" <HMadjid@mindspring.com>

References:
- Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
  - From: Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com>

Prev by Date: Radio Disney Affiliates Told to Steer Clear of DreamWorks' Shrek
Next by Date: Re: Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
Previous by thread: Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
Next by thread: Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread