[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
Actually a lot of noise was made about the telecom act of 96. Maybe not in
general public circles, but certianly in the telecommuincation and broadcast
industry, there was all sorts of lobbying about it.
73, de Hakim (N1ZFF)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Franklyn Weil" <sven@gordsven.com>
To: "Donna Halper" <dlh@donnahalper.com>
Cc: <boston-radio-interest@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: Boston radio now-- or rather, Clear Channel radio now
> On Tue, 1 May 2001, Donna Halper wrote:
> > by the Republican congress, who have received MILLIONS in donations and
> > contributions from the NAB and various companies like Clear
> > Channel.
>
> Weren't these the same people responsible for killing LPFM? Clinton could
> still have vetoed it and then let the Congress try to over-ride. He could
> have done that to make a statement and get people up in arms, because that
> veto would have made the news.
>
> Telecom 96 was pretty quiet stuff....I don't remember much noise being
> made about it.
>
>
> Sven F. Weil
> email: sven@chookus.com
> WWW homepage: http://home.gordsven.com/gordsven/sven
> RadioLand Site: http://home.gordsven.com/gordsven/sven/radiomuseum.html
>