[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: LXIV

Not to nit pick....

But I believe LXIV is 64, not 44, that would be XLIV (10 before 50 and 1
before 5)

-Paul Hopfgarten
-Derry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
> [mailto:owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org]On Behalf Of
> lglavin@lycosmail.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 7:04 PM
> To: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
> Subject: LXIV
>
>
> I got around to checking out WGBX-TV channel 44's
> signal yesterday.  My main TV is on the cable, and
> I haven't experienced any problems all throughout
> the Cedar Street reconstruction. But I also have a
> table-top TV (with internal antenna) in my kitchen that I use about once a
>
> week to watch Fox News Sunday on channel 25.  For
> months, when I checked channel 44, there was a minimal
> flickering image;  before the Westinghouse/CBS/
> Viacom tower buildup, channel 44 was a trifle less
> enjoyable to watch than channels 25 and 56. (Ch 38 was
> and still is p*ss-poor I don't know why).
> However, now the picture on channel 44 is very close
> to the signal quality of 25 and 44.  Question:
> channel 44 is LICENSED with 1,510,000 watts at 1080 feet
> and has an application for 1,100,000 watts at 1227 feet.
> Does anyone know whether they're still broadcasting
> with the previously licensed facilities  or the
> the higher-up-on-the-tower applied-for facilities?
>
> Laurence from Methuen
> (30 miles North of the junction of rts 9 & 128)
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Get free personalized email at http://email.lycos.com
>