[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More Canadian censorship

To: kc1ih@mediaone.net, wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: More Canadian censorship
From: Dib9@aol.com
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 18:21:39 EST
CC: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

In a message dated 1/8/00 4:33:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, kc1ih@yahoo.com 
writes:

<< It's a totally different thing! >>

No, it's not.  The whole labyrinthine of acronyms in public broadcasting is 
simply a bureaucratic attempt to give an appearance of independence.  If the 
governments providing most of the money to pay the bills, by definition its 
government broadcasting.

-- Dan Billings, Bowdoinham, Maine

Follow-Ups:
- Public broadcasting funding
  - From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>

Prev by Date: Re: More Canadian censorship
Next by Date: Re: More Canadian censorship
Previous by thread: Re: More Canadian censorship
Next by thread: Public broadcasting funding
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread