[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Quick before it melts, take a look at the date on this:

To: Kevin Vahey <kvahey@megsinet.net>
Subject: Re: Quick before it melts, take a look at the date on this:
From: Donna Halper <dlh@donnahalper.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2000 01:47:57 -0500
Cc: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-Reply-To: <005401bf55b2$2c8c6000$dc24fea9@q6l0p1>
References: <001001bf54cd$3b3f5b60$38c74e0c@oemcomputer><200001030531.AAA25321@world.std.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

Kevin wrote:
>mmm not on my machine
>
>Monday, January 3rd, 3900

And the other newspaper, the Valley whatever (I forget the name-- it's 
on-line with the Rutland paper) has it Jan 3, 100.  Well, hey, they're 
really ahead of their time!!!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quick before it melts, take a look at the date on this:
  - From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@world.std.com>

References:
- Re: Here we go again, Part II
  - From: "Dan Strassberg" <Dan.Strassberg@worldnet.att.net>
- Re: Quick before it melts, take a look at the date on this:
  - From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@world.std.com>
- Re: Quick before it melts, take a look at the date on this:
  - From: Kevin Vahey <kvahey@megsinet.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Quick before it melts, take a look at the date on this:
Next by Date: Re: Y2K glitch??? or just a little time travel?
Previous by thread: Re: Quick before it melts, take a look at the date on this:
Next by thread: Re: Quick before it melts, take a look at the date on this:
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread