[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WSRO

To: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: WSRO
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 11:37:45 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-Reply-To: <199910150450.AAA26896@world.std.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.991014165524.8402A-100000@gord.isdn.lightning.net><l03130300b42c5ba6481f@[24.128.154.102]><199910150450.AAA26896@world.std.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Fri, 15 Oct 1999 00:47:36 -0400, "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@world.std.com> said:

> Then why did the CRTC require the CBC to give up their AM signals in order 
> to get FM signals?

The CRTC does not permit same-market simulcasts.

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick

References:
- Re: WSRO
  - From: Sven Weil <sven@lily.org>
- Re: WSRO
  - From: Larry Weil <kc1ih@mediaone.net>
- Re: WSRO
  - From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@world.std.com>
- Re: WSRO
  - From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@world.std.com>

Prev by Date: "The Radio Rabbi" and early remotes
Next by Date: Re: WSRO
Previous by thread: AM/FM (was WSRO)
Next by thread: Re: WSRO (CJMS-1280)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread