[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reverb, etc
- Subject: Re: reverb, etc
- From: Sven Weil <sven@lily.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:34:40 -0400 (EWT)
Yeah....that still happens to me...hopefully not with this new SL-1200
turntable i'm getting and after I replace the surrounds on my speakers :)
Also...radio stations do have ahigh fideltiy equipment....a record played
in the stuido (and monitored over the studio speakers) will sound MUCH
better than when when you listen tothe same tape/LP/CD on some cheezy $100
all-in-one home hi-fi
- --
Sven F. Weil
e-mail: sven@lily.org
World Wide Web: http://www.lily.org/~sven
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Kaimbridge M. GoldChild wrote:
> Rick Ganley wrote,
>
> > At every station I've ever worked at (including my own), I've
> > heard from a handfull of listners that have said "how come it
> > doesn't sound like the album?" meaning the CD/ cassette/ LP sounded
> > 'better'. Of course, you could go into a long explanation about
> > compression to overcome noise floor/ road noise/ weak signal,
> > equalization to give everything a uniform and signature sound,
> > reverb to make the music sound "fuller" or stroke the talents ego,
> > etc.
>
> It was just the opposite with me: When I was young and would get a
> record, I always wondered why the record didn't sound as good as the
> radio and was told that was because I just had a cheap record player and
> that radio stations used a lot of power (though that explanation lost
> all credibility when FM became a competing player and sounded just as
> bad--I used to like to A/B WBZ AM-FM when they simulcasted the morning
> news: AM had a nice richly textured atmosphere, while the FM sounded
> like you were in a padded closet!).
>
> ~Kaimbridge~
>
------------------------------